FN96

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Revision as of 12:35, 28 February 2009 by Mdpeters (talk | contribs) (New page: People v. Esposito, 144 Misc. 2d 919, 545 N.Y.S.2d 468 (Sup. Ct. 1989), related reference, 144 Misc. 2d 1085, 545 N.Y.S.2d 673 (Sup. Ct. 1989) and related reference, 146 Misc. 2d 847, 553 ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

People v. Esposito, 144 Misc. 2d 919, 545 N.Y.S.2d 468 (Sup. Ct. 1989), related reference, 144 Misc. 2d 1085, 545 N.Y.S.2d 673 (Sup. Ct. 1989) and related reference, 146 Misc. 2d 847, 553 N.Y.S.2d 612 (Sup. Ct. 1990) and order aff'd, 160 A.D.2d 378, 554 N.Y.S.2d 16 (1st Dep't 1990).

As to the applicability of privilege against self-incrimination to grand jury proceedings, see 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Grand Jury § 38.

Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470, 93 S. Ct. 2208, 37 L. Ed. 2d 82 (1973).

As to the admissibility of computerized evidence, see Admissibility of Computerized Business Records, 14 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 2d 173.