FN16: Difference between revisions

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Ark Crim C § 5-41-105(2); Ga Code Ann § 26-9953a; Ky Rev Stats § 434.860; Miss Code Ann § 97-45-11; Ohio Rev C § 2901.112(I)(1); SC Code of Laws § 16-16-30(3); Tenn Crim Offenses § ...)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Ark Crim C § 5-41-105(2); Ga Code Ann § 26-9953a; Ky Rev Stats § 434.860; Miss Code Ann § 97-45-11; Ohio Rev C § 2901.112(I)(1); SC Code of Laws § 16-16-30(3); Tenn Crim Offenses § 39-14-603(2); Code of Va § 18.2-152.10(3); BloomBecker, Computer Crime Laws § 3:5.
Ark Crim C § 5-41-105(2); Ga Code Ann § 26-9953a; Ky Rev Stats § 434.860; Miss Code Ann § 97-45-11; Ohio Rev C § 2901.112(I)(1); SC Code of Laws § 16-16-30(3); Tenn Crim Offenses § 39-14-603(2); Code of Va § 18.2-152.10(3); BloomBecker, Computer Crime Laws § 3:5.
NH Rev Stat §§ 637:2, 637:3.
Arguments that may be made in support of each of these objections are discussed in §§ 168– 170.
Fla Stat §§ 815.01–815.07; Cal Pen C § 502.
Motion to dismiss charge is discussed in § 138.

Latest revision as of 17:12, 1 March 2009

Ark Crim C § 5-41-105(2); Ga Code Ann § 26-9953a; Ky Rev Stats § 434.860; Miss Code Ann § 97-45-11; Ohio Rev C § 2901.112(I)(1); SC Code of Laws § 16-16-30(3); Tenn Crim Offenses § 39-14-603(2); Code of Va § 18.2-152.10(3); BloomBecker, Computer Crime Laws § 3:5.

NH Rev Stat §§ 637:2, 637:3.

Arguments that may be made in support of each of these objections are discussed in §§ 168– 170.

Fla Stat §§ 815.01–815.07; Cal Pen C § 502.

Motion to dismiss charge is discussed in § 138.