Intent—Purpose

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Revision as of 03:46, 18 February 2009 by Mdpeters (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Intent—Purpose== The use of the word "purpose" in computer crime laws requires proof that the person charged under those laws had a specific intent to commit a certain type of crime. ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Intent—Purpose

The use of the word "purpose" in computer crime laws requires proof that the person charged under those laws had a specific intent to commit a certain type of crime. Language of a statute using "purpose" reflects this requirement. California's statute applies this standard. It provides that "any person who accesses a computer for the purpose of devising any scheme or artifice to defraud is guilty of a public offense."FN43 However, knowingly accessing a computer system without the intent to devise a scheme to defraud would not be a crime under a statute using this language. For example, if a hacker only wanted to look around, not to change data, steal anything, or otherwise disrupt the system, he or she would not be liable under such a provision.