Help:Contents: Difference between revisions

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


[http://www.isaca.org/ '''COBIT''']<br>
[http://www.isaca.org/ '''COBIT''']<br>
[http://cpcaf.aicpa.org/Resources/Sarbanes+Oxley/Summary+of+the+Provisions+of+the+Sarbanes-Oxley+Act+of+2002.htm '''Sarbanes-Oxley''']<br>
[http://cpcaf.aicpa.org/Resources/Sarbanes Oxley/Summary of the Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.htm '''Sarbanes-Oxley''']<br>
[http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/pl104191.htm '''HIPAA''']<br>
[http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/pl104191.htm '''HIPAA''']<br>
[http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/glbact.html '''GLBA''']<br>
[http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/glbact.html '''GLBA''']<br>

Revision as of 05:49, 10 June 2007

Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.

Getting started



File:Greenlock.jpg The status of this control objective is acceptable.

File:Yellowlock.jpg The status of this control objective requires additional attention.

File:Bluelock.jpg The status of this control objective has been remediated.

File:Redlock.jpg The status of this control objective is not acceptable and requires remediation.



The risk potential condition is low. Use this image to provide a visual indication.

The risk potential condition is medium. Use this image to provide a visual indication.

The risk potential condition is high. Use this image to provide a visual indication.



Use this icon to visually illustrate what would be considered a key control.


A brief explanation of industry or legislative control requirments can be found through the links below.

COBIT
Oxley/Summary of the Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.htm Sarbanes-Oxley
HIPAA
GLBA
PCI
FISMA
NIST SP 800-66
Ditscap
DOI
FFIEC
Control Exception: If a control condition exists that is exempt from testing, documentation should be available.
User Defined: Any control that is truly unique to the enterprise should be noted accordingly.


--Mdpeters 10:46, 10 May 2006 (EDT)