FN10: Difference between revisions

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: U. S. v. Kelly, 507 F. Supp. 495 (E.D. Pa. 1981). Federal criminal prosecutions under wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C.A. § 1343) for use of "blue box" or similar device permitting user to ma...)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
U. S. v. Kelly, 507 F. Supp. 495 (E.D. Pa. 1981). Federal criminal prosecutions under wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C.A. § 1343) for use of "blue box" or similar device permitting user to make long-distance telephone calls not reflected on company's billing records, 34 A.L.R. Fed. 278.
U. S. v. Kelly, 507 F. Supp. 495 (E.D. Pa. 1981). Federal criminal prosecutions under wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C.A. § 1343) for use of "blue box" or similar device permitting user to make long-distance telephone calls not reflected on company's billing records, 34 A.L.R. Fed. 278.
Md C Art 27 § 340(h)(11).
As to cross-examination of witnesses at a preliminary hearing, see Pretrial Procedures and Motions in Criminal Cases, 5 Am. Jur. Trials 27.
Admissibility of evidence of other offenses in rebuttal of defense of entrapment, 61 A.L.R. 3d 293. Callahan, Predisposition and the Entrapment Defense, pp 24–31, FBI Law Enforcement Bull (Aug 1984); Callahan, Predisposition and the Entrapment Defense, pp 26–31, FBI Law Enforcement Bull (Sept 1984).
Transport Indem. Co. v. Seib, 178 Neb. 253, 132 N.W.2d 871, 11 A.L.R.3d 1368 (1965).

Latest revision as of 17:03, 1 March 2009

U. S. v. Kelly, 507 F. Supp. 495 (E.D. Pa. 1981). Federal criminal prosecutions under wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C.A. § 1343) for use of "blue box" or similar device permitting user to make long-distance telephone calls not reflected on company's billing records, 34 A.L.R. Fed. 278.

Md C Art 27 § 340(h)(11).

As to cross-examination of witnesses at a preliminary hearing, see Pretrial Procedures and Motions in Criminal Cases, 5 Am. Jur. Trials 27.

Admissibility of evidence of other offenses in rebuttal of defense of entrapment, 61 A.L.R. 3d 293. Callahan, Predisposition and the Entrapment Defense, pp 24–31, FBI Law Enforcement Bull (Aug 1984); Callahan, Predisposition and the Entrapment Defense, pp 26–31, FBI Law Enforcement Bull (Sept 1984).

Transport Indem. Co. v. Seib, 178 Neb. 253, 132 N.W.2d 871, 11 A.L.R.3d 1368 (1965).