FN93

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Revision as of 12:31, 28 February 2009 by Mdpeters (talk | contribs) (New page: Va C § 18.2-152.5. The constitutional requirement of a grand jury indictment with respect to "infamous" crimes is a limitation only on the federal government. 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Grand Jury ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Va C § 18.2-152.5.

The constitutional requirement of a grand jury indictment with respect to "infamous" crimes is a limitation only on the federal government. 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Grand Jury § 3.

Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S. Ct. 1893, 26 L. Ed. 2d 446, 53 Ohio Op. 2d 55 (1970); Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470, 93 S. Ct. 2208, 37 L. Ed. 2d 82 (1973). Validity and construction of statute requiring defendant in criminal case to disclose matter as to alibi defense, 45 A.L.R. 3d 958. Construction and application of Rule 12.1, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, requiring, upon written notice, exchange of names of witnesses to be used to establish or rebut defendant's alibi, 42 A.L.R. Fed. 878.

For examples of sophisticated jury selection techniques, see A Ginger, Jury Selection in Civil and Criminal Trials (Lawpress, Tiburon CA 1984).