FN70

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Revision as of 10:53, 25 February 2009 by Mdpeters (talk | contribs) (New page: 18 U.S.C.A. 1029. For another form of an order setting amount of bail, see 4 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Bail and Recognizance, Form 11. Admissibility of computerized evidence...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

18 U.S.C.A. 1029.

For another form of an order setting amount of bail, see 4 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Bail and Recognizance, Form 11.

Admissibility of computerized evidence is discussed in § 168.

Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600, 6 Ohio Misc. 231, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 431 (1966), related reference, 84 Ohio St. 3d 70, 701 N.E.2d 1002 (1998); Estes v. State of Tex., 381 U.S. 532, 85 S. Ct. 1628, 14 L. Ed. 2d 543 (1965), reh'g denied, 382 U.S. 875, 86 S. Ct. 18, 15 L. Ed. 2d 118 (1965), on remand to, 396 S.W.2d 123 (Tex. Crim. App. 1965); Chandler v. Florida, 449 U.S. 560, 101 S. Ct. 802, 66 L. Ed. 2d 740 (1981).

Minnesota [CRIMJIG] § 25.04.