SOX.2.0.16:

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Revision as of 18:12, 14 June 2006 by Tdspain (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


1. Risk: Insufficient controls over processing accuracy by a third-party service provider may result in inaccurate financial results.
a. SOX.2.0.16 A regular review of security, availability and processing integrity is performed by third-party service providers (e.g., SAS 70, Canadian 5970).



Testing Procedures

Inquire whether third-party service providers perform independent reviews of security, availability and processing integrity, e.g., service auditor report. Obtain a sample of the most recent review and determine if there are any control deficiencies that would impact financial reporting.


Testing Frequency

Quarterly validation of all systems within scope.

Evidence Archive Location

Insert hyperlink or location of evidence archive.

Control Stewards Process Narrative

Insert Process Narrative here.


Control Steward – Steve Somebody

Process Illustration

Replace this test by inserting a process diagram, flowchart or other visual representation to illustrate the process narrative as necessary. Include a brief description of the process illustration.

Control Status and Auditors Commentary

The control is effective.


File:Greenlock.jpg

Status is acceptable.

Control Exception Commentary

Status is acceptable.

Remediation Plan

Remediation is not required at this time.