FN18: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: 11 Del C § 938(b).) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
11 Del C § 938(b). | 11 Del C § 938(b). | ||
NM Stat § 30-16-24. | |||
Discovery of computerized evidence is discussed in § 111. | |||
People v. Edwards, 86 Cal. App. 3d 260, 150 Cal. Rptr. 86 (2d Dist. 1978). | |||
Computer Law Forms Handbook § 13.4.2 The problem that arises is in determining just what is of a confidential nature and what is being declared confidential for purposes of keeping otherwise discoverable material secret. Rubber-stamping documents confidential is one device, while wording a protective order to be overly inclusive is another. Unfortunately, these delaying tactics often must be resolved through a mini-trial. Computer Law Forms Handbook § 13.4.2. | |||
Latest revision as of 17:15, 1 March 2009
11 Del C § 938(b).
NM Stat § 30-16-24.
Discovery of computerized evidence is discussed in § 111.
People v. Edwards, 86 Cal. App. 3d 260, 150 Cal. Rptr. 86 (2d Dist. 1978).
Computer Law Forms Handbook § 13.4.2 The problem that arises is in determining just what is of a confidential nature and what is being declared confidential for purposes of keeping otherwise discoverable material secret. Rubber-stamping documents confidential is one device, while wording a protective order to be overly inclusive is another. Unfortunately, these delaying tactics often must be resolved through a mini-trial. Computer Law Forms Handbook § 13.4.2.