FN56: Difference between revisions
(New page: 10 U.S.C.A. § 934, 2252; U.S. v. Smith, 47 M.J. 588 (N.M.C.C.A. 1997), review denied (C.A.A.F. Mar. 25, 1998).) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
10 U.S.C.A. § 934, 2252; U.S. v. Smith, 47 M.J. 588 (N.M.C.C.A. 1997), review denied (C.A.A.F. Mar. 25, 1998). | 10 U.S.C.A. § 934, 2252; U.S. v. Smith, 47 M.J. 588 (N.M.C.C.A. 1997), review denied (C.A.A.F. Mar. 25, 1998). | ||
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 10 Ohio Misc. 9, 36 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 63, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966), reh'g denied, 385 U.S. 890, 87 S. Ct. 11, 17 L. Ed. 2d 121 (1966). Right to counsel during custodial interrogation of accused, 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law § 314. Invalidity of Suspect's Waiver of Miranda Rights, 42 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 2d 617. What constitutes "custodial interrogation" within rule of Miranda v. Arizona requiring that suspect be informed of his federal constitutional rights before custodial interrogation, 31 A.L.R. 3d 565; Comment Note—Necessity of informing suspect of rights under privilege against self-incrimination, prior to police interrogation, 10 A.L.R. 3d 1054. Scope and extent, and remedy or sanctions for infringement, of accused's right to communicate with his attorney, 5 A.L.R. 3d 1360. Duty to advise accused as to right to assistance of counsel, 3 A.L.R. 2d 1003. | |||
Investigating the Criminal Case; General Principles, 1 Am. Jur. Trials 481; Locating and Preserving Evidence in Criminal Cases, 1 Am. Jur. Trials 555 (use of blood, prints, and impressions as evidence); Locating Scientific and Technical Experts, 2 Am. Jur. Trials 293 (locating criminalists and laboratories). Fingerprints, palm prints, or bare footprints as evidence, 28 A.L.R. 2d 1115. | |||
BloomBecker, Computer Crime Update: The View As We Exit 1984, 7 West New Eng LR 627 (Spr 1985). | |||
People v. Beagle, 6 Cal. 3d 441, 99 Cal. Rptr. 313, 492 P.2d 1 (1972). Right to impeach witness in criminal case by inquiry or evidence as to witness's criminal activity not having resulted in arrest or charge—Modern state cases, 24 A.L.R. 4th 333. Construction and application of Rule 609(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence permitting impeachment of witness by evidence of prior conviction of crime, 39 A.L.R. Fed. 570; Construction and application of Rule 608(b) of Federal Rules of Evidence dealing with use of specific instances of conduct to attack or support credibility, 36 A.L.R. Fed. 564. | |||
Latest revision as of 10:57, 5 March 2009
10 U.S.C.A. § 934, 2252; U.S. v. Smith, 47 M.J. 588 (N.M.C.C.A. 1997), review denied (C.A.A.F. Mar. 25, 1998).
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 10 Ohio Misc. 9, 36 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 63, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966), reh'g denied, 385 U.S. 890, 87 S. Ct. 11, 17 L. Ed. 2d 121 (1966). Right to counsel during custodial interrogation of accused, 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law § 314. Invalidity of Suspect's Waiver of Miranda Rights, 42 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 2d 617. What constitutes "custodial interrogation" within rule of Miranda v. Arizona requiring that suspect be informed of his federal constitutional rights before custodial interrogation, 31 A.L.R. 3d 565; Comment Note—Necessity of informing suspect of rights under privilege against self-incrimination, prior to police interrogation, 10 A.L.R. 3d 1054. Scope and extent, and remedy or sanctions for infringement, of accused's right to communicate with his attorney, 5 A.L.R. 3d 1360. Duty to advise accused as to right to assistance of counsel, 3 A.L.R. 2d 1003.
Investigating the Criminal Case; General Principles, 1 Am. Jur. Trials 481; Locating and Preserving Evidence in Criminal Cases, 1 Am. Jur. Trials 555 (use of blood, prints, and impressions as evidence); Locating Scientific and Technical Experts, 2 Am. Jur. Trials 293 (locating criminalists and laboratories). Fingerprints, palm prints, or bare footprints as evidence, 28 A.L.R. 2d 1115.
BloomBecker, Computer Crime Update: The View As We Exit 1984, 7 West New Eng LR 627 (Spr 1985).
People v. Beagle, 6 Cal. 3d 441, 99 Cal. Rptr. 313, 492 P.2d 1 (1972). Right to impeach witness in criminal case by inquiry or evidence as to witness's criminal activity not having resulted in arrest or charge—Modern state cases, 24 A.L.R. 4th 333. Construction and application of Rule 609(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence permitting impeachment of witness by evidence of prior conviction of crime, 39 A.L.R. Fed. 570; Construction and application of Rule 608(b) of Federal Rules of Evidence dealing with use of specific instances of conduct to attack or support credibility, 36 A.L.R. Fed. 564.