FN55: Difference between revisions

From HORSE - Holistic Operational Readiness Security Evaluation.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 1; Communications Act of 1934, § 223(a, d), as amended, 47 U.S.C.A. § 223(a, d). Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844, 117 S. Ct. 2329, 138 L. Ed. 2...)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 1; Communications Act of 1934, § 223(a, d), as amended, 47 U.S.C.A. § 223(a, d). Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844, 117 S. Ct. 2329, 138 L. Ed. 2d 874 (1997).
U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 1; Communications Act of 1934, § 223(a, d), as amended, 47 U.S.C.A. § 223(a, d). Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844, 117 S. Ct. 2329, 138 L. Ed. 2d 874 (1997).
Mont C § 45-2-101(74).
As to when an accused may withdraw a plea, see 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law § 506.
GTE on "Our Newest Public Enemy" at p 105 in Introduction to Computer Crime, J BloomBecker, ed., National Center for Computer Crime Data (Los Angeles 1985); BloomBecker, Computer Crime Update: The View As We Exit 1984, 7 West New Eng LR 627 (Spr 1985).
Voir dire questions are discussed in § 160.

Latest revision as of 10:55, 5 March 2009

U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 1; Communications Act of 1934, § 223(a, d), as amended, 47 U.S.C.A. § 223(a, d). Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844, 117 S. Ct. 2329, 138 L. Ed. 2d 874 (1997).

Mont C § 45-2-101(74).

As to when an accused may withdraw a plea, see 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law § 506.

GTE on "Our Newest Public Enemy" at p 105 in Introduction to Computer Crime, J BloomBecker, ed., National Center for Computer Crime Data (Los Angeles 1985); BloomBecker, Computer Crime Update: The View As We Exit 1984, 7 West New Eng LR 627 (Spr 1985).

Voir dire questions are discussed in § 160.