FN21

BloomBecker, Computer Crime Laws § 3:3.

Okla Stat Ann tit 21, § 1732.

As to motions made at the close of preliminary hearings, see Pretrial Procedures and Motions in Criminal Cases, 5 Am. Jur. Trials 27.

Modern status of test of criminal responsibility—State cases, 9 A.L.R. 4th 526; Modern status of rules as to burden and sufficiency of proof of mental irresponsibility in criminal case, 17 A.L.R. 3d 146; Appealability of orders or rulings, prior to final judgment in criminal case, as to accused's mental competency, 16 A.L.R. 3d 714; Qualification of nonmedical psychologist to testify as to mental condition or competency, 78 A.L.R. 2d 919; Insanity of accused at time of commission of offense, not raised at trial, as ground for habeas corpus or coram nobis after conviction, 29 A.L.R. 2d 703. As to insanity at time of alleged crime as a defense to criminal charges generally, see 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law §§ 33–39.

Chatman v. State, 164 Ind. App. 97, 326 N.E.2d 839, 75 A.L.R.3d 641 (2d Dist. 1975); Matter of Ferguson, 78 Mich. App. 576, 261 N.W.2d 8 (1977).