FN70: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: 18 U.S.C.A. 1029. For another form of an order setting amount of bail, see 4 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Bail and Recognizance, Form 11. Admissibility of computerized evidence...) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 10:53, 25 February 2009
18 U.S.C.A. 1029.
For another form of an order setting amount of bail, see 4 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Bail and Recognizance, Form 11.
Admissibility of computerized evidence is discussed in § 168.
Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600, 6 Ohio Misc. 231, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 431 (1966), related reference, 84 Ohio St. 3d 70, 701 N.E.2d 1002 (1998); Estes v. State of Tex., 381 U.S. 532, 85 S. Ct. 1628, 14 L. Ed. 2d 543 (1965), reh'g denied, 382 U.S. 875, 86 S. Ct. 18, 15 L. Ed. 2d 118 (1965), on remand to, 396 S.W.2d 123 (Tex. Crim. App. 1965); Chandler v. Florida, 449 U.S. 560, 101 S. Ct. 802, 66 L. Ed. 2d 740 (1981).
Minnesota [CRIMJIG] § 25.04.