Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • Not restrained by the First Amendment, countries outside of the United States have begun to regulate online content as they would publications or speech # Germany v. CompuServe Deutschland (Bavaria 1999). A regional court reversed the conviction of Felix Somm, the former head of CompuServe German ...
    2 KB (314 words) - 19:35, 10 April 2011
  • United States courts use the Miller test for determining whether speech or expression is ...ems from Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), in which the US Supreme Court held that material is obscene if each of the following factors is satisfied ...
    6 KB (925 words) - 18:53, 10 April 2011
  • ...schools; (2) the Library Services Technology Act, which provides grants to states for support of libraries; and (3) the E-rate program, under the Communicati ...associations and website publishers. Under a strict scrutiny analysis, the court held that because CIPA conditioned federal funding on public libraries’ use ...
    5 KB (707 words) - 19:01, 10 April 2011
  • ...District of Columbia and of the territories and possessions of the United States, and their various subdivisions; or ...ersons, other than agencies, instrumentalities, or employees of the United States; or ...
    5 KB (795 words) - 00:35, 1 June 2010
  • (2) Such additional amount as the court may allow, except that--<br> ...the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court.<br> ...
    4 KB (689 words) - 12:30, 16 October 2014
  • (2) Such additional amount as the court may allow, except that--<br> ...the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court.<br> ...
    4 KB (689 words) - 12:28, 16 October 2014
  • Unlike state laws that emanate from the common law right of the states to legislate against many types of crime, the federal criminal law must hav Supranational organizations provide mechanisms whereby disputes between states may be resolved through arbitration or mediation. When a country is recogni ...
    20 KB (3,032 words) - 13:27, 12 October 2011
  • ...by the Justice Department and signed by a United States District Court or Court of Appeals judge, a wiretap order permits law enforcement to intercept comm ...to gather evidence of crime unrelated to their rights or property. United States v. Harvey, 540 F.2d 1345, 1352 (8th Cir. 1976). ...
    9 KB (1,342 words) - 18:26, 13 April 2011
  • “Addressing the threshold of copyright-ability . . ., the Supreme Court [has] held that ‘[t]he sine qua non of copyright[ability] is originality’ a ...ve works” provision of the Copyright Act. 17 U.S.C. § 201(c). The district court granted summary judgment for defendants. ...
    6 KB (1,026 words) - 06:44, 11 April 2011
  • (1) The purpose of section 552 of title 5, United States Code, popularly known as the Freedom of Information Act, is to require agen Section 552(f) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:<br> ...
    18 KB (2,889 words) - 10:47, 22 May 2010
  • The '''Computer Fraud and Abuse Act''' is a law passed by the United States Congress in 1984 intended to reduce cracking of computer systems and to add ...usively for such use, used by or for a financial institution or the United States Government and the conduct constituting the offense affects that use by or ...
    14 KB (2,101 words) - 11:35, 27 August 2011
  • ...ppen, he registered their other trademark, Panaflex, as a domain name. The Court held that the Federal Trademark Dilution Act could be violated without the ...e mark “is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark's owner.” ...
    10 KB (1,540 words) - 12:16, 21 March 2011
  • ...ors should always be concerned with admissibility issues that may arise in court proceedings. Chapter 5 addresses both hearsay and Confrontation Clause issu ...ices. Further, several sections within the Criminal Division of the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., have expertise in computer-relat ...
    11 KB (1,632 words) - 12:36, 5 August 2011
  • ...iacom v. YouTube, 2008 WL 2627388 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) (slip. at p. 20)[1], the court held that YouTube was a remote computing service (and therefore ECPA prohib A district court held that retrieving for subscribers text messages that had been sent over ...
    14 KB (2,207 words) - 17:22, 13 April 2011
  • ...a magistrate. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510(9) and 2516(1); see also In re United States of America, 10 F.3d 931 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 64 (1994). ...oving wire or electronic interception, the application must state, and the court order must indicate, that a particular named subject is using various and c ...
    29 KB (4,458 words) - 12:24, 16 October 2014
  • ...United States George W. Bush on December 16, 2003, establishes the United States' first national standards for the sending of commercial e-mail and requires ...rs to get permission before they send marketing messages. It also prevents states from enacting stronger anti-spam protections, and prohibits individuals who ...
    26 KB (4,026 words) - 12:15, 5 May 2011
  • ...CA amended [[Title 17 of the United States Code|Title 17]] of the [[United States Code]] to extend the reach of copyright, while limiting the liability of th ...ally requires separate legislation by or within each of the Union's member states.) ...
    26 KB (3,969 words) - 11:00, 30 October 2011
  • ...iary issues arising when the government seeks to admit computer records in court, including hearsay and the foundation to establish the authenticity of comp ...the term has the connotation of a positive declaration." See, e.g., United States v. Lewis, 902 F.2d 1176, 1179 (5th Cir. 1990); Lexington Ins. Co. v. W. Pen ...
    43 KB (6,432 words) - 13:22, 5 August 2011
  • ...party to a copyright treaty; (2) the work is first published in the Unites States or a country that is a party to the Universal Copyright Convention; (3) the ...uter to another in the absence of any perceptible rendition." Instead, the court found that such activities were more appropriately classified as "reproduct ...
    14 KB (2,130 words) - 06:38, 11 April 2011
  • As the Supreme Court has held, “Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority,” that “e ...eview “must be undertaken and analyzed on a case-by-case basis,” where the court’s “guiding principle is a result based on a meaningful analysis and a prope ...
    15 KB (2,359 words) - 19:34, 10 April 2011
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)